![]() Accordingly, when an offer of reward is accepted by performance, it becomes a binding contract, based on the principles, and governed by the laws, of contracts generally and this is especially true in the case of rewards offered by private individuals and organizations."Īlso helpful is the comment found in Anno., Prize Contests Rights and Remedies, 87 A.L.R.2d 649 (1963), where it is said, at 661: * * * rewards are essentially contractual. ![]() Since an offer of a reward calls for an act, the performance of the act in compliance with the terms and conditions of the offer before its termination constitutes such an acceptance."Īnd it is said in 77 C.J.S. "As has been pointed out, an offer of a reward is merely a proposal, and acceptance of the terms of the offer is necessary to create a binding contract. It is a mere coincidence that Rosenthal was himself a party to the transaction which he alleged did not conform to the offer.īefore we consider in further detail the facts before the lower court in this case, and the manner in which those facts were presented for the court's consideration on motion for summary judgment, we shall examine the texts and the cases, for a clearer understanding of the law.Ī concise statement of the applicable principles is found in 67 Am.Jur.2d Rewards § 13 (1973 & Supp.1976): His claim is that Packer became obligated to pay him $20,000 when he proved that Packer's published offer was "not absolutely true". Appellant's declaration does not claim a breach of his purchase contract. This contract was never consummated, but that fact has little if any, relevance to this case. Rosenthal responded to the advertisement, and on 13 June 1972 he signed a contract with Packer for the purchase of a 1972 Ford automobile known as an LTD Brougham. In June 1972 Packer published newspaper advertisements conveying to the public, substantially this information: His appeal from that judgment suffers a like fate in this Court. Allen granted summary judgment against him. Rosenthal lost below, when Judge Milton B. ![]() Such a contract was asserted by Gilbert Rosenthal, appellant here, in a suit for $20,000 he filed in the Superior Court of Baltimore City against Al Packer Ford, Inc., appellee here. To a person who performs a specified act, and the offer is accepted by performance of the act. Spector, Baltimore, on the brief, for appellee.Īrgued before THOMPSON, MOYLAN and POWERS, JJ.Ī lawful and enforceable contract may come into being when one announces or circulates to all who may see or hear, an offer or promise that he will give or pay a reward or prize Goldman, Baltimore, with whom was Joseph W.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |